Its the silly season for journalism so I will not be bogging anything too serious this month.
I have spent sometime thinking about the blog and how to make it more interesting and specifically how to get more people to come to the site and comment on the blog posts. I have been using twitter and I see some additional activity when I tweet and mention www.theaxion.com but I am not sure how to get more followers on twitter, after all, I am not famous. Anyway I will continue to look for ways to drive traffic to the site as only when I get enough people engaged and commenting will the site really take off.
Talking of twitter, I was wondering what would happen if in the future social media sites became so popular and essential that everyone on the planet was using them. Then disruption to these sites could cause serious civil disturbance and mayhem. The reason is that without knowing who was responsible for the disruption people may turn on their governments or feel that a foreign power was responsible and this could start a war. Only recently we have seen issues arise and finger pointing in South Korea and the US where hackers, apparently based in foreign countries, have disrupted internet services. At times of heightened international tension these cyber attacks and finger pointing could be used politically to justify retaliation.
Last week twitter and a number of other sites were taken down by a denial of service (DOS) attack which supposedly was mounted by Russian hackers (or the Russian state?) against a single blogger who was pro Georgian.
Whilst clearly not the end of the world it was inconvenient for many and I have noticed that businesses and governments are increasingly using these sites as a means of communication with the public and employees. In the event of a crisis these sites also allow vital information and sometimes misinformation to spread rapidly. I see, for example, that the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) has a twitter account and use it to tell people of emerging serious health issues around the world and the UK government is encouraging party members and civil servants to tweet daily, to spread pro government propaganda.
Iran is a case in point. Twitter was used by reformist protesters to get information about the governments crackdown out to the western world and to some extent attempts by the Iranian authorities to block Internet and SMS messaging succeeded but tweets and youtube content still get out.
I am sure that many governments are now are keen to gain control of their populations Internet use and especially twitter, not least of course the UK government. Unfortunately, it seems that Internet and telecommunications equipment manufactures are making this control possible by including interception and monitoring hardware and software as part of their products. In a way these companies are responsible for suppression and even the possible detention of protesters who unwittingly used the services not knowing that their every phone call, SMS, tweet and Internet browse were being watched and traced back to them.
Obviously governments will say that this monitoring facility is essential to enable them to track and prevent terrorism but where it is clear that repressive regimes are concerned I think the UN should ban the export of this technology to these regimes in a similar way as they do for arms that could be used to suppress and torture the citizens.
Personally, even in western democracies, I fail to see why the internet and phone calls should be intercepted by the state en-mass in the vague hope that a terrorist communication will be uncovered. They do it because the technology allows it and makes it easy whereas if we had only written letters sent by post the government would have to steam open all the letters to read them and find a way to know who sent a letter and from where and where it was going. If they did this it would cause an uproar but for some reason we don’t complain when they do it to our phone calls, SMS, browsing and emails. We should.